|
Post by arfurmo on Sept 21, 2015 9:51:19 GMT
I'm sorry but this board does not operate on the system that one is duty bound to reply to your posting, especially when the answer is self-evident. You mean good manners do not apply when you are asked a direct question? I suggest that you are nit in the slightest bit 'sorry' Very interesting - ignore those that one disagrees with - a recipe for a very somnolent board!
|
|
|
Post by arfurmo on Sept 21, 2015 9:53:23 GMT
The US caused the chaos, how many refugees are they taking? A very silly comment. The Americans are responsible for the uprising against Assad? Absolute nonsense!
|
|
|
Post by starlilolill on Sept 21, 2015 11:06:23 GMT
There are others, but have to agree - the US are determined to see Assad ousted. They are the ones doing the bombing so responsibility for the current situation need to be addressed!
Living in Syria must be a total nightmare. Support Assad, ISIS attacks. Support anyone else Assad attacks.
Young or old, I would want out, wouldn't you?
|
|
|
Post by arfurmo on Sept 21, 2015 13:33:45 GMT
There are others, but have to agree - the US are determined to see Assad ousted. They are the ones doing the bombing so responsibility for the current situation need to be addressed! If the US was 'determined' to oust Assad, then he would be gone They are not bombing Syria per se, but are bombing ISIL (which has claimed part of Syria as the Islamic State) You left-inclined people are not very good on facts -anything goes as long as it is anti-US
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2015 13:39:18 GMT
There are others, but have to agree - the US are determined to see Assad ousted. They are the ones doing the bombing so responsibility for the current situation need to be addressed! If the US was 'determined' to oust Assad, then he would be gone They are not bombing Syria per se, but are bombing ISIL (which has claimed part of Syria as the Islamic State) You left-inclined people are not very good on facts -anything goes as long as it is anti-US I agree Arfamo - if the US wanted him gone he would be history, but it is an incredibly complex 'war', and as with all similar conflicts it is the poor who bear the brunt, especially those too poor to go anywhere let alone Europe.
|
|
|
Post by starlilolill on Sept 21, 2015 14:01:55 GMT
There are others, but have to agree - the US are determined to see Assad ousted. They are the ones doing the bombing so responsibility for the current situation need to be addressed! If the US was 'determined' to oust Assad, then he would be gone They are not bombing Syria per se, but are bombing ISIL (which has claimed part of Syria as the Islamic State) You left-inclined people are not very good on facts -anything goes as long as it is anti-US ISIL must have a helluva hold on Syria as most major CIVILIAN area seem to have been raised to the ground! Bombed by Assad I believe. If that is attacking ISIL - see what I mean?
|
|
|
Post by arfurmo on Sept 21, 2015 14:24:54 GMT
If the US was 'determined' to oust Assad, then he would be gone They are not bombing Syria per se, but are bombing ISIL (which has claimed part of Syria as the Islamic State) You left-inclined people are not very good on facts -anything goes as long as it is anti-US ISIL must have a helluva hold on Syria as most major CIVILIAN area seem to have been raised to the ground! Bombed by Assad I believe. If that is attacking ISIL - see what I mean? But that is not the US bombing Syria - that is Assad and the US cannot be held responsible
|
|
|
Post by starlilolill on Sept 21, 2015 14:29:31 GMT
If you cannot accept that Syria is now a total wreck then heaven help us all. There are wrongs on all sides it would seem - bombing them even more as the US and Cameron want to do is really not helping the situation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2015 15:15:31 GMT
You don't think that IS with all the stolen and captured heavy munitions are doing any of the damage? I think they are doing their fair share, and the more terror they can cause the better. Therefore they don't give a jot for how much mayhem they cause in a civilian area. Indeed it suits them because their enemies know what lies ahead if captured, so they tend to hop it fairly smartly.
|
|
|
Post by arfurmo on Sept 21, 2015 15:17:14 GMT
If you cannot accept that Syria is now a total wreck then heaven help us all. [/quote]Of course it is - I am simply arguing against the contention put forward by you and Arena that its is the fault of the US It is not. The US can be blamed for many things but not the terrible situation in Syria They may want to bomb Syria, but they do not bomb Syria - they bomb ISIL territory that is held by Islamic militants. It is surely in the interest of the West and Syria that ISIL is defeated
|
|
|
Post by starlilolill on Sept 22, 2015 11:25:45 GMT
Cobblers yet again. You say '..they do not bomb Syria', so where are they bombing then?
ISIL territory seems to take in all the major towns and cities in Syria - I had no idea they were everywhere! I say this because of what I know of the devastation in that country. Bombing everywhere is not the way to sort this out.
The US and UK are keen to use bombs - perhaps that has something to do with their psyche, or perhaps something to do with the arms industry. Whatever it is it isn't the answer.
|
|
|
Post by arfurmo on Sept 22, 2015 12:52:16 GMT
Cobblers yet again. You say '..they do not bomb Syria', so where are they bombing then? For the third time - they are bombing in those areas described as 'Islamic State' No it does not. It does not include the major cities of Damascus, Latakia or Aleppo. Why do you not check your facts before making sweeping sstements? Then what is the answer? Should ISIL be allowed a free hand? Bombing was instrumental in the relief of Kososvo
|
|
|
Post by starlilolill on Sept 22, 2015 13:43:22 GMT
Have you seen pictures of Damascus, Latakia and Aleppo? Obviously not!
Someone's bombing them - who do you imagine that could be?
|
|
|
Post by arfurmo on Sept 22, 2015 13:58:56 GMT
Have you seen pictures of Damascus, Latakia and Aleppo? Obviously not! Someone's bombing them - who do you imagine that could be? Yes I have seen pictures No need to imagine - we know who is bombing them You appear to go out of your way to blame the US Silly knee-jerk left-wingery
|
|