spot
Silver Surfer
Posts: 110
|
Post by spot on Oct 18, 2023 3:43:21 GMT
I may, depending on your point of view, have taken to talking to myself this last six months. Or to an AI. It's not a question to which I have an answer. I'll list a couple if you've never tried - claude.ai/chats and the rather better known chat.openai.com/ - that one asks for a signup, Claude... Claude asks for your email address, uses a verification code and then lets you talk. So neither are anonymous, both are free, both will let you hand them $20 a month for more resources and I chip in with openAI but not with Claude. They are astonishing pieces of software. Siri and Cortana are nothing by comparison, they're irrelevances, I never used either and wouldn't give them house room. But this year's explosion of conversational AI is the most exciting development in software since spreadsheets and word processing and relational databases - if I thought for a bit I'd extend that list but you get the point. YouTube, maybe. Predictably, schools have started burning crosses on the AIs' garden plots. Schools don't like them. Schools disliked Wikipedia too. What schools really dislike are places where pupils can find answers with less effort than they used to, that's what schools really dislike, and it's a shocking attitude from people at least nominally in the business of teaching rather than running a correctional facility. I think people have forgotten what plagiarism actually is - passing off someone else's words as your own. What homework markers ought to be doing is checking their charges have honed their citation skills, rather than banning who they talk to. Learning how to use Wikipedia was educational too, but the warders still don't think it's suitable. It's an astonishing resource the like of which the world has never seen before, but they refuse to see it. My thanks to whichever of you threw the reminder at my email account, and indeed for keeping the place looking so tidy. Forums were at one stage the equivalent of the village pub, but then social media happened. Forums, those still running, are repositories of conversations and consequently valuable assets. I don't think X and Facebook are anything of the sort, they're write-only environments, they're the oubliette of the online world. If I can come back here after six years knowing the people I'm addressing and that I'll get a healthy mental workout talking with them again then that's a world-class benefit. Anyway, who else has taken an AI out for a spin?
|
|
|
Post by ARENA on Oct 18, 2023 7:06:47 GMT
I may, depending on your point of view, have taken to talking to myself this last six months. Or to an AI. It's not a question to which I have an answer. I'll list a couple if you've never tried - claude.ai/chats and the rather better known chat.openai.com/ - that one asks for a signup, Claude... Claude asks for your email address, uses a verification code and then lets you talk. So neither are anonymous, both are free, both will let you hand them $20 a month for more resources and I chip in with openAI but not with Claude. They are astonishing pieces of software. Siri and Cortana are nothing by comparison, they're irrelevances, I never used either and wouldn't give them house room. But this year's explosion of conversational AI is the most exciting development in software since spreadsheets and word processing and relational databases - if I thought for a bit I'd extend that list but you get the point. YouTube, maybe. Predictably, schools have started burning crosses on the AIs' garden plots. Schools don't like them. Schools disliked Wikipedia too. What schools really dislike are places where pupils can find answers with less effort than they used to, that's what schools really dislike, and it's a shocking attitude from people at least nominally in the business of teaching rather than running a correctional facility. I think people have forgotten what plagiarism actually is - passing off someone else's words as your own. What homework markers ought to be doing is checking their charges have honed their citation skills, rather than banning who they talk to. Learning how to use Wikipedia was educational too, but the warders still don't think it's suitable. It's an astonishing resource the like of which the world has never seen before, but they refuse to see it. My thanks to whichever of you threw the reminder at my email account, and indeed for keeping the place looking so tidy. Forums were at one stage the equivalent of the village pub, but then social media happened. Forums, those still running, are repositories of conversations and consequently valuable assets. I don't think X and Facebook are anything of the sort, they're write-only environments, they're the oubliette of the online world. If I can come back here after six years knowing the people I'm addressing and that I'll get a healthy mental workout talking with them again then that's a world-class benefit. Anyway, who else has taken an AI out for a spin? Hello Spot.
|
|
spot
Silver Surfer
Posts: 110
|
Post by spot on Oct 18, 2023 10:07:56 GMT
Hello Arena, I'll throw a demonstration into the thread - do tell me if you think I'm taking up too much screen room, the exchange might look intimidating. The blue bits are me speaking, the normal black text between is all auto-generated by ChatGPT-4. I had an invitation by email to revisit an online forum I'd used last about six years ago. I consequently dropped round, it's still there, it looks well-maintained. It has less traffic than it had ten years back though. Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter have allowed people to watch each other's messages flit across their screens but people rarely hold threaded conversations on those, something forums and earlier bulletin boards were far better at. Forums also allow long-term conversations where a single thread can be periodically bumped, the context of new posts maintained, sometimes for years rather than just a day or two. Please assess the comparative roles of these platforms in maintaining a community environment as opposed to what might amount to a write-only environment where most people have no idea who they're reading messages from. The rise of various online communication platforms over the years has transformed the way we interact online, bringing with them different strengths and weaknesses. In understanding the roles of forums vs. social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter, it's crucial to break down their characteristics and their implications for maintaining a community environment. - Depth of Conversation:
- Forums: As you pointed out, forums are ideal for threaded conversations. The structure allows for depth and continuity in discussions, enabling users to respond directly to others' comments, thereby maintaining context. It's not unusual to see threads on forums that span several years with regular users revisiting and adding new content.
- Social Media: Conversations on platforms like Twitter are typically more ephemeral. They're often reactive and immediate, and while threads do exist, they don’t have the same depth and persistence as forum threads. The character limit on platforms like Twitter also hampers in-depth discussion.
Community Building: - Forums: Forums often foster a stronger sense of community, especially if they revolve around specific interests or niches. Regular members get to know each other's online personalities and can form lasting digital friendships. The continuous nature of threads allows for a collective memory and shared experiences.
- Social Media: While groups on Facebook or specialized communities on other platforms can replicate a sense of community, the broader nature of these platforms means that interactions can be more scattered and less intimate.
Visibility and Reach: - Forums: Typically, forums are more closed ecosystems. A post in a forum will only be seen by members or those who visit the forum.
- Social Media: Posts, especially if they go viral, have a much broader reach. They can be seen, shared, and commented on by millions, often beyond the original intended audience.
Anonymity and Persona: - Forums: They often allow (or even encourage) pseudonyms, allowing users a degree of anonymity which can lead to more open conversations but can also lead to issues like trolling.
- Social Media: While pseudonymous accounts exist, there's a stronger push towards real identity, especially on platforms like Facebook. This can make interactions more personal but can also deter open expression due to privacy concerns.
Speed and Immediacy: - Forums: Conversations can be slow and deliberative, with responses coming over days or weeks.
- Social Media: The expectation is for rapid responses. Conversations happen in real-time or near real-time.
Write-Only vs. Interactive Environments: - Forums: The very nature of forums encourages interaction. It's about discussion, debate, and shared knowledge.
- Social Media: There's often a flood of content, and the sheer volume can lead to a more passive consumption or "write-only" environment. While interactions occur, the vast amount of content means many posts are scrolled past and go unnoticed.
In conclusion, while both forums and social media platforms have their roles in shaping online communities, forums are often better suited for deeper, ongoing interactions within a tight-knit community. Social media, on the other hand, excels in immediacy, reach, and the potential for virality. The best platform depends on the nature of the community and the goals of its members. For genuine community building with depth and continuity, forums often have the edge. However, for reaching a wider audience and rapid, timely interactions, social media platforms take the lead. Consider conversational AI involvement on a forum, both in moderating a high-traffic site and in greeting sporadic posters, keeping threads alive during slack periods and generally providing well-constructed grammar - it would make a welcome change on occasion.The integration of conversational AI in online forums can indeed offer several advantages. Here are some potential roles and benefits of AI in forum management and participation: - Moderation:
- Filtering & Flagging: AI can be trained to recognize and flag inappropriate content, spam, or posts that violate community guidelines. This would make the moderation process more efficient by allowing human moderators to review flagged content rather than sifting through everything.
- User Behavior Analysis: AI can analyze user behaviors to identify potential trolls, bots, or users who consistently contribute negatively to conversations. By spotting these patterns, the system can alert moderators to take appropriate action.
Engagement: - Thread Bumping: During periods of low activity, AI can identify valuable or interesting threads and bump them to the top to rekindle conversations.
- Question Answering: For forums centered around specific topics or knowledge
sharing (e.g., tech support, hobby forums), AI can provide instant answers to frequently asked questions or direct users to existing threads that address their concerns. Engaging Sporadic Posters: AI can recognize when a user hasn't posted in a while and initiate engagement, either by sending them a notification about a thread they might be interested in or directly replying to one of their older posts with relevant information. - Grammar & Style Corrections: Conversational AI, especially one that's trained in language processing, can suggest or automatically correct grammar and style issues in posts, leading to clearer communication.
- Post Summarization: In very active threads with hundreds of replies, AI can provide summaries or highlight key points, making it easier for newcomers to catch up or for regular members to recall the crux of the conversation.
Community Building: - Personalized Recommendations: Based on a user's activity, AI can recommend threads or forum sections that align with their interests, increasing the chances of sustained engagement.
- Icebreaker Initiatives: AI can periodically start new threads with interesting prompts or questions to spark discussions during slow times.
User Assistance: - Onboarding: New members can be greeted by AI, which can provide a quick tutorial, answer questions about forum functionalities, or even introduce them to popular or relevant threads.
- Search Assistance: AI can enhance the search function by understanding user intent, suggesting relevant threads, or even answering queries directly.
However, while there are clear advantages to integrating conversational AI into forums, there are also potential challenges and considerations: - Over-reliance on AI: A forum that leans too heavily on AI for content might end up feeling sterile or artificial. It's essential to strike a balance so that genuine human interactions remain the forum's core.
- Privacy Concerns: Users might be wary of an AI analyzing their posts and behavior. Transparency about how the AI operates and what data it accesses is crucial.
- Mistakes & Misunderstandings: No AI is perfect. There will be times when it misunderstands context or intent, leading to incorrect moderations or inappropriate replies.
- Potential for Gaming the System: Malicious users might try to find ways to manipulate or trick the AI, requiring constant updates and learning to stay ahead.
In conclusion, while conversational AI can indeed play a transformative role in managing and enhancing online forums, it's essential to implement it thoughtfully, always considering the human element and ensuring that AI complements rather than replaces genuine community interactions. Most of that would be considered helpful, though few posters would welcome AI-edited corrections however much the online environment would be improved.You're right, and this underscores the importance of user consent and transparency in the implementation of AI solutions, especially in online community spaces. When it comes to forums, where users value autonomy and self-expression, it's crucial to approach any interventions with sensitivity. Here's how the AI's involvement can be fine-tuned to address these concerns: - Opt-In Solutions: Instead of making AI interventions the default, forums can offer them as opt-in features. For instance, a user could choose to enable AI-assisted grammar and style checks on their posts, much like some word processing software does.
- Suggestions Rather than Direct Corrections: Instead of automatically correcting posts, the AI could highlight potential errors or areas for improvement and suggest corrections. Users can then choose to accept, modify, or ignore these suggestions.
- User Feedback Loop: Implement a system where users can provide feedback on AI suggestions or interventions. This not only allows the AI to improve over time but also gives users a sense of control and agency over the process.
- Clear Communication: Clearly communicate the AI's role and capabilities. Users should know what the AI does, why it's doing it, and how it benefits the community. This helps in building trust.
- Privacy Assurance: Assure users that their data is not being used beyond the scope of the forum's AI features. Privacy policies should be clear and transparent, explaining how user data is used and protected.
- Human Moderators Still in Charge: Emphasize that while the AI can assist, final decisions, especially on content moderation, remain in the hands of human moderators. This reassures users that there's still human judgment at play, which understands nuance and context better than AI.
- Periodic Review: Periodically review and update AI features based on community feedback and technological advancements. Allow users to be a part of this process, maybe through surveys or feedback threads, so they feel involved in shaping the community's future.
In essence, while AI can be a powerful tool to enhance the online forum experience, it's vital to approach its implementation with a user-first mindset. By giving users control, ensuring transparency, and valuing feedback, forums can leverage AI's strengths without alienating their user base. Those are all relevant observations and indeed, if opt-in correction were on offer, I can well imagine myself selecting it. I have often discovered spelling mistakes days after posting and seeing it as a permanent stain on my persona.Absolutely, many people feel similarly. Online conversations often happen in real-time or in quick succession, and it's easy to make typos or grammar mistakes in the rush to respond, especially when we're multitasking or distracted. Having an opt-in AI-powered tool that helps catch and correct these errors before posting can be invaluable for those who value the precision and clarity of their online communications. When one's digital footprint can last indefinitely, it's understandable to desire the means to present oneself in the best light. A tool like this could ensure that the message being conveyed isn't overshadowed by small mistakes. Moreover, such a feature could offer additional benefits: - Learning Tool: Over time, by seeing and correcting mistakes, users might find that they make fewer errors in general, essentially using the tool as a learning aid.
- Clarity: Ensuring that posts are grammatically correct and clear can lead to fewer misunderstandings in online conversations, fostering a more productive and positive forum environment.
- Inclusivity: For non-native speakers, an opt-in correction tool could be particularly beneficial, allowing them to participate in discussions with more confidence.
However, as always, the key is user agency. As long as users have the choice to enable or disable such features and trust that their data is being used responsibly, these tools can be a valuable addition to the online communication landscape. Thank you for your attention, you've expanded my initial query and provided valuable food for thought.You're very welcome! I'm glad I could provide insights and expand on your initial query. If you have any more questions or topics you'd like to explore in the future, don't hesitate to reach out. Enjoy your day and happy pondering!
|
|
|
Post by bubacra on Oct 25, 2023 18:43:21 GMT
Advanced search algorithms powered by machine learning help customers find products more easily machine learning for e-commerce, even if they use vague or misspelled search terms. This reduces frustration and drives more conversions. Dynamic Pricing: Machine learning allows e-commerce businesses to dynamically adjust product prices based on factors like demand, competition, and customer behavior. This pricing strategy can maximize profits and competitiveness.
|
|