|
Budget
Nov 23, 2017 9:04:42 GMT
Post by anybody on Nov 23, 2017 9:04:42 GMT
In our day budget meant,to balance the books.Now it seems a reason to print more money. May said there was no money-tree,as she handed billions to the Ulster mob to keep her in a job and now Hammond is dishing out money to keep her afloat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Budget
Nov 23, 2017 9:06:38 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2017 9:06:38 GMT
In our day budget meant,to balance the books.Now it seems a reason to print more money. May said there was no money-tree,as she handed billions to the Ulster mob to keep her in a job and now Hammond is dishing out money to keep her afloat. Any Budget from whichever party always ends up with us paying out more, thankfully it's a bit less more under a Tory budget than a Labour one
|
|
|
Budget
Nov 23, 2017 12:05:49 GMT
Post by ARENA on Nov 23, 2017 12:05:49 GMT
'People will feel BETRAYED' Philip Hammond savaged over what Budget means for pensioners PHILIP Hammond's failure to pump more money into the UK’s crisis-hit care system sparked a barrage of criticism from pensioner groups and charities as they warned more elderly people will go without the help they need.
That's from the VERY pro-right Express.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Budget
Nov 23, 2017 15:29:26 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2017 15:29:26 GMT
Can never understand why any chancellor doesn't go for the obvious money earner and whack the tax/duty on booze up considering the effect that alcohol is having on people's health, and the NHS. They whacked the tax/duty on tobacco for health reasons so why not booze I would also allow all classes of drugs to be licenced and sold on the high street, and claw back tax on that too.Why shouldn't the Exchequer have the proceeds and profits instead of drug barons
|
|
|
Budget
Nov 23, 2017 17:14:18 GMT
Post by aubrey on Nov 23, 2017 17:14:18 GMT
In our day budget meant,to balance the books.Now it seems a reason to print more money. May said there was no money-tree,as she handed billions to the Ulster mob to keep her in a job and now Hammond is dishing out money to keep her afloat. Any Budget from whichever party always ends up with us paying out more, thankfully it's a bit less more under a Tory budget than a Labour one That depends on who you are.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Budget
Nov 23, 2017 17:17:22 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2017 17:17:22 GMT
Any Budget from whichever party always ends up with us paying out more, thankfully it's a bit less more under a Tory budget than a Labour one That depends on who you are. I don't think it does, you only have to look at the tax take from different governments. The "take" is from us
|
|
|
Budget
Nov 23, 2017 17:24:47 GMT
Post by aubrey on Nov 23, 2017 17:24:47 GMT
There is more than one kind of tax.
Tory budgets always benefit be better off.
The cut in stamp duty will benefit someone I know by £5,000, and she is well-off enough to be buying a house anyway. and will only boost the housing market by raising the price of housing. It will not do anything to provide more housing, or to prevent homelessness - which, in itself, will be exacerbated by the way UC us being introduced. So, you might be slightly better off: but it is at the expense of people who will be a lot worse off: people whose low pay and precarious employment conditions directly subsidise the low prices you pay for the things you will spend your tax cut (etc) on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Budget
Nov 23, 2017 21:49:40 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2017 21:49:40 GMT
There is more than one kind of tax. Tory budgets always benefit be better off. The cut in stamp duty will benefit someone I know by £5,000, and she is well-off enough to be buying a house anyway. and will only boost the housing market by raising the price of housing. It will not do anything to provide more housing, or to prevent homelessness - which, in itself, will be exacerbated by the way UC us being introduced. So, you might be slightly better off: but it is at the expense of people who will be a lot worse off: people whose low pay and precarious employment conditions directly subsidise the low prices you pay for the things you will spend your tax cut (etc) on. You're believing the nonsense that the Trot Mcdonnell churns out, rubbish to be devoured by the sheeple. There will be plenty more houses built, perhaps you missed the Chancellor's comments that an enquiry will established if builders and developers are sitting on land for commercial reasons and if so measures will be taken. Suddenly houses will start being built everywhere and the surplus will start reducing prices, win win. Similarly LAs will be pressed to build social housing, Mrs May has made this her mission, win win The whole Budget is designed for those who work and to help others into work which the socialists don't like as they like to control peoples lives Responsibilities rather than rights
|
|
|
Budget
Nov 24, 2017 7:50:32 GMT
Post by ARENA on Nov 24, 2017 7:50:32 GMT
There is more than one kind of tax. Tory budgets always benefit be better off. The cut in stamp duty will benefit someone I know by £5,000, and she is well-off enough to be buying a house anyway. and will only boost the housing market by raising the price of housing. It will not do anything to provide more housing, or to prevent homelessness - which, in itself, will be exacerbated by the way UC us being introduced. So, you might be slightly better off: but it is at the expense of people who will be a lot worse off: people whose low pay and precarious employment conditions directly subsidise the low prices you pay for the things you will spend your tax cut (etc) on. You're believing the nonsense that the Trot Mcdonnell churns out, rubbish to be devoured by the sheeple. There will be plenty more houses built, perhaps you missed the Chancellor's comments that an enquiry will established if builders and developers are sitting on land for commercial reasons and if so measures will be taken. Suddenly houses will start being built everywhere and the surplus will start reducing prices, win win. Similarly LAs will be pressed to build social housing, Mrs May has made this her mission, win win The whole Budget is designed for those who work and to help others into work which the socialists don't like as they like to control peoples lives Responsibilities rather than rights What is a Trot, Bryan?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Budget
Nov 24, 2017 8:46:13 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2017 8:46:13 GMT
You're believing the nonsense that the Trot Mcdonnell churns out, rubbish to be devoured by the sheeple. There will be plenty more houses built, perhaps you missed the Chancellor's comments that an enquiry will established if builders and developers are sitting on land for commercial reasons and if so measures will be taken. Suddenly houses will start being built everywhere and the surplus will start reducing prices, win win. Similarly LAs will be pressed to build social housing, Mrs May has made this her mission, win win The whole Budget is designed for those who work and to help others into work which the socialists don't like as they like to control peoples lives Responsibilities rather than rights What is a Trot, Bryan? Not quite the same as a c*nter
|
|
|
Budget
Nov 24, 2017 8:46:52 GMT
Post by aubrey on Nov 24, 2017 8:46:52 GMT
I think it means Trotskyite. I don't know what that means, in relation to UK politics though.
I'd really like to know what responsibilities rather than rights means. It's usually used by people who want to remove the responsibility of employers to provide a safe place of work.
Please don't use terms like Sheeple, though. It sounds like one of those people who have "Woke" in their twitter description.
|
|
|
Budget
Nov 24, 2017 8:48:31 GMT
Post by aubrey on Nov 24, 2017 8:48:31 GMT
By the bye, that's a big misreading of socialism, and it sits badly with a supporter of a govt that wants control what we can see online.
|
|
|
Budget
Nov 24, 2017 9:58:31 GMT
Post by goldelox on Nov 24, 2017 9:58:31 GMT
Name calling is abusive or insulting language referring to a person or group, a verbal abuse. This phenomenon is studied by a variety of academic disciplines from anthropology, to child psychology, to politics. It is also studied by rhetoricians, and a variety of other disciplines that study propaganda techniques and their causes and effects. The technique is most frequently employed within political discourse and school systems, in an attempt to negatively impact their opponent.
|
|
|
Budget
Nov 24, 2017 10:05:52 GMT
Post by anybody on Nov 24, 2017 10:05:52 GMT
Or 'Say what you mean but don't say it mean'
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Budget
Nov 24, 2017 12:13:03 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2017 12:13:03 GMT
I think it means Trotskyite. I don't know what that means, in relation to UK politics though. I'd really like to know what responsibilities rather than rights means. It's usually used by people who want to remove the responsibility of employers to provide a safe place of work. Please don't use terms like Sheeple, though. It sounds like one of those people who have "Woke" in their twitter description. Society is full of pernicious people who like to scream about their rights but ignore their responsibilities I find it ironic that you object to the word "sheeple" given the language and terms you used in one of your recent posts BTW You think that there are no Trots in Corbyn's Labour party. ROFL
|
|