|
|
Post by goldelox on Oct 23, 2017 15:11:18 GMT
Just watched it. That was a bit gruesome, don't you think!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2017 16:22:45 GMT
It was but seemingly it was historically correct, that's what they used to do. It's the old argument about how much do you show in dramas/programmes etc. For instance is full nudity more sexy than none, just an impression. I don't thinks so, the old Brigitte Bardot films were very seductive but you never saw any of her "bits"
One thing is certain, all this publicity will ensure a big audience next time
|
|
|
|
Post by aubrey on Oct 23, 2017 17:22:11 GMT
It was but seemingly it was historically correct, that's what they used to do. It's the old argument about how much do you show in dramas/programmes etc. For instance is full nudity more sexy than none, just an impression. I don't thinks so, the old Brigitte Bardot films were very seductive but you never saw any of her "bits" One thing is certain, all this publicity will ensure a big audience next time The thing about the nudity is that the censors at the time of the Bardot films obviously thought nudity was sexier than no nudity: they weren't doing it out of the goodness of their hearts, to make it more sexy. I have no problem with nudity - less than no problem really - but I find it hard to watch intense violence and cruelty, and will probably avoid it; and I definitely won't watch anything where animals get killed. I'd be straight on Cannibal Holocaust and Cannibal Ferox were it not for that. |
|
|
|
Post by ARENA on Oct 23, 2017 20:47:40 GMT
I'm with you Aubs.I have always been against the glorification of violence and thus never watch @godfather' type films. I feel it is necessary (particularly for the young) to be taught the rewards of good and the negativity of wrong.
The guys in the white hats should always win.......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2017 20:59:47 GMT
I'm with you Aubs.I have always been against the glorification of violence and thus never watch @godfather' type films. I feel it is necessary (particularly for the young) to be taught the rewards of good and the negativity of wrong. The guys in the white hats should always win....... But is it glorification, it actually happened like that apparently so is historically correct. Thankfully in our civilised world we have moved on and by showing and learning how it was may help to prevent it ever returning |
|
|
|
Post by aubrey on Oct 23, 2017 21:45:58 GMT
I'm with you Aubs.I have always been against the glorification of violence and thus never watch @godfather' type films. I feel it is necessary (particularly for the young) to be taught the rewards of good and the negativity of wrong. The guys in the white hats should always win....... But is it glorification, it actually happened like that apparently so is historically correct. Thankfully in our civilised world we have moved on and by showing and learning how it was may help to prevent it ever returning Actually, I agree with both of you: the violence in the Gunpowder thing should be shown, because it did happen. And in things like The Game of Thrones because people are like that (and it is based on English history as well). The Godfather is more difficult. I've never seen it and I feel I should because it is a work of art, but |i don't like gangster stuff. That's more because I don't like the feel of them, or the atmosphere. I love Gialli though, but they never feel real. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2017 8:10:31 GMT
Any historical event should be shown and exposed
Classic example being the Holocaust. Would anyone argue that should not have been exposed on the grounds that it was too awful?. We recently had a glimpse of the awfulness of the Irish potato famine shown in Victoria. These things happened, awful as they are they are part and parcel of our history
|
|
